Profile

All opinions on this site are those of Mike Jones and are not intended to represent his employers or associates.

 

Posts
« What people are saying about FCPx | Main | What the fuck is my Transmedia Strategy..? »
Wednesday
Jun222011

FCPx - Why I cant stomach giving money to Apple.

Twitter has, not surprisingly, been set alight by the release of FCPx today. Rightly or Wrongly a much anticipated new version of the venerable (but decidedly dated) Final Cut Pro was always going to generate much traffic. The fact that it is a seemingly radical overhaul with “new” ways of thinking only makes it more so.

I have written before about how the marketing diatribe of the Fruit Company is blindly arrogant in it’s assertions of newness - there really is nothing radically new in FCPx that we havn’t already seen before in Premiere, Vegas, Edius and AVid. But even I am shocked by the swarm of negativity and Bad Blood washing over twitter this morning.

Sure, its a 1.0 release of a major (and much over-due) new version. But the list of omissions and absences of even the basic and core functionality seems almost ludicrous.

Jon Chappell of Digital Rebellion has posted the most succinct Good, bad and Ugly list and the ugliest is downright mangey dog ugly indeed.

  • It took a long time for multiple marker colors to be added to Final Cut Pro. Now we’re back to one marker color again. There are no chapter markers either.
  • You need an OpenCL-compatible graphics card. This has left some Mac Pro owners out in the cold.
  • The QuickTime movie output options in FCPX are poor, which means you’re obligated to pay an extra $49 for Compressor 4 because you can’t send to Compressor 3.
  • Compressor 4 is still 32-bit and doesn’t look like it’s received an overhaul, meaning that the problems many of us have suffered are likely to continue. I have already had several issues with Qmaster.
  • No multicam. This is a massive oversight in my opinion.
  • No XML import / output. Another huge oversight.
  • A lot of plugin developers have been left out in the cold with no answers from Apple.
  • No support for old FCP 7 projects.
  • No credible broadcast monitor output. The current solution is to mirror your desktop through a capture card, which does not result in a broadcast-quality output.

And there’s more:

- No Tape-Based ingest. Firewire is coming but other than that nothing for higher end decks and formats. 
- Some formats are not supported at all like 1080p50
- No external apps for Sound, DVD authoring, BluRay Authoring or Colour grading
- No project consolidation with handles 
- No OMF Support
- No custom window layouts 
- No Multi-clipping 
- No EDL support
- No AAF support
- No support for RED RAW files
- No XDCAM Support
- No Audio Mixer and no timeline audio keyframing 

A single tweet gave me a small glimmer of hope when it suggested that the Apple Pro Apps codecs (ie ProRes) had been re-released as a universal installer. The implication being that you would no longer have to own FCP to be able to use ProRes. Alas this turned out to be false. Here was a major opportunity for Apple to cement ProRes as a free universal cross-platform standard for lossless intermediates. But no…. It’s the approach Avid have taken with DNxHD - a lossless high bitrate intermediate codec that operates in standard QT wrapper and is entirely cross platform and usable in any NLE that uses QuickTime. if you have a mixed environment DNxHD is far and away the best free choice (and second only to the superb Cineform if you want to pay some money). Instead Apple maintains it’s backward thinking closed shop approach….

HD WARRIOR

 

Beyond these glaring omissions above there are two other elements to the FCPx release that really piss me off and confirm my disdain for Apple as a company. The first is that they have (in typical fashion) NOT told their 3rd party developers Anything. They have been left completely out in the cold and unable to make any development or business plans. This is just a really shitty way to treat the small third-party developers that for a decade have made FCP vibrant and functional when it should have been resigned to the antiquated bin.

Moreover, with the release of FCPx Apple have discontinued support of FCP7. This is reprehensible. To replace wholesale a long standing and well trusted post-production work horse with a lame, hobbled, swiss-cheese like release lacking the core professional functionality listed above, is just really fucked and speaks to the arrogant disdain Apple hold their professional users. 

Michael Kammes expands on this issue of Apple’s disdain for the companies, people and products that help it thrive -

“As a techie, and as a loyal servant of a VAR (Value Added Reseller), my rear is quite chaffed. As Apple VARs – ones that advertise your product, ones that learn to support your product, ones that defend your product when it’s on the client’s chopping block, it appears that we are no longer worth your respect and attention. With no way to re-sell and no way to easily deploy, we are being phased out. An App Store purchase is easier than a VAR, isn’t it Apple? While it may not make a dent in your bottom line, it’s a solid backhand to those of us who pumped, sold, and built facilities based off  FCP 1. FCP2. FC3. FCP 3.04. We helped make Final Cut Pro what it is. We didn’t even get put in a retirement home, we went straight to the morgue.”

A phased transition from FCP7 to the FCPx - with continued updates for FCP7 - would not only be the righteous thing to do for customers that have invested so much in FCP, but would also be the way to avoid all this Bad Blood and negativity floating in the twitterverse. Users would have forgiven FCPx its failings, seen it for what it was (a 1.0 release in development) and slowly phased their business and work practice over to the new paradigm as they grew used to it and its missing features were added in.

What bothers me most of all about all this is that, despite the ongoing arrogance and brutalist business practices of Apple - the contempt with which they continually treat their dedicated users and 3rd party developers, the mindless secrecy and litigation practices they maintain against anyone who breaks their cone of silence - there will still be an army of idiot fanboys screaming about how great FCPx is and blithely forgiving all other sins.

I look forward to exploring the new FCPx as much as anyone - its an exciting and fascinating release - and I always welcome fresh thinking to creative tools. But the idea of giving that arsehole company my money makes me sick to the stomach.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

I am baffled by this release. I have never been the "all in one" editor that apple seems to think we are. I always cut with dual system sound, often with multiple cameras, and I send my footage to a colorist, and an omf to the sound editor for Pro Tools. I NEVER publish straight from FCP. At the end everything gets put back into final cut for a final export then is sent to compressor (often to make dozens of disks to be sent to film festivals). I'm an Indie editor more than a "professional" (although my dream is to break into that level). Why is FCP shutting out those of us that depend on it for all of our work needs?! As it stands, FCP X is utterly useless to me and I can't afford Avid.
June 22, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTori Walker
Its a good obsrrvation Tori. As Phillip Johnston said, theres never been a better time to jump ship to a company that actually seems to care about having a good and productive relationship with pro users and 3rd party developers - Adobe have open public beta programs, keep 3rd party devs in the loop with long term roadmaps and respond to users with incrimental updates that deliver on core functionality.

Apple have released a crippled software unfit for professional use but what makes that a real sin is that they removed all support for the old version on the same day.

Seeing this release i cant help but see Apple as a company whose modus operandi is arrogance and dismissive contempt of their users. they dont deserve out money. Sometime ago i started moving to Premiere and this retarded lovechild just confirms the wisdom f that decison.

Thanks for posting
Mike
June 22, 2011 | Registered CommenterMike Jones
Remember a couple of years ago, when Microsoft was the arrogant, evil Big Brother?
To me Apple has just taken over that position. (Actually, I feel like that for quite a while).
June 23, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGunnar Refardt
I think you're not alone in seeing the shift in persona of Apple as a company. They have taken some of the old Microsoft mantle. Somewhat Ironically Windows 7 is the best thing MS have ever produced; fast lean and stable.

I own and have relied upon a lot of Apple products over many years, just as many others in the creative fields, but the sycophancy that Apple have built up around their brand has become toxic. The good will and customer loyalty they have is used to mask over some appalling business practices. The recent iCloud was another example - the apple iron curtain of secrecy meant third party developers had no idea what was going to be in the new OS. So with one fell swoop Apple deliver a killer blow to young companies that were filling niche gaps In the apple ecosystem - witness Dropbox. The bundled together stamping out of competition to establish apple exclusivity. by these kind of practices Apple demonstrate the self same monopolistic bombast that Windows was once famous for.

Thanks for reading
Mike
June 23, 2011 | Registered CommenterMike Jones
Yeah, Apple has recently gotten a little too awesome.
Even Avid is opening up with supporting 3rd-party hardware and i gues they'll open up more (if they're smart)… who would have thought 5 years ago.
June 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGunnar Refardt
I can't use FCPX for the majority of my work. I'm going to have to start looking seriously at Adobe and Avid and that may potentially lead to me not using apple hardware as well
June 24, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterbrettdc
Well....never thought that the day would come where a Sony Vegas user would stare into the eyes of a FCPX user and say "HA!"
June 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGeorge
Well, this is a wonderful opportunity for the remaining professional NLEs to gain market share. With the release of iMovie Pro (I refuse to call this Final Cut Pro X) Avid, Adobe, Sony, et al., have an amazing opportunity to gain a huge number of FCP editors.

Sony Vegas Pro, though, should be the one to bring the FCP deserters to their software. It has for years delivered what Final Cut Pro should have delivered with this release - 64-bit architecture, a format agnostic timeline, drag-and-drop functionality, built-in-export, native playback of AVCHD (with no re-wrapping) instant preview of applied effects, and on and on.

Mike - you've said it best in several blog posts. Sony Vegas Pro is the most underrated NLE out there.

After downloading and trying FCPX, I went running back to Vegas Pro on my Bootcamp partition. I even downloaded trials of Avid MC and Premiere Pro and worked with them for a few days, but nothing beats the speed and versatility of Vegas. Now, if Sony would just change the name...

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.